crednews is the original content division of cred.ai

the original content division of cred.ai

Federal Judge Blocks Credit Card Late Fee Cap Rule Amid Legal Battle

Federal Judge Blocks Credit Card Late Fee Cap Rule Amid Legal Battle

In a recent legal development, a federal judge appointed during the Trump administration has temporarily blocked a Biden administration rule that aimed to cap late fees for credit card users. The move comes as a setback for President Biden’s efforts to protect consumers from excessive financial burdens.

Introduced by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the measure sought to cut late payment fees from $32 to $8. However, the new ruling, made by U.S. District Judge Mark T. Pittman, puts a pause on the implementation of the rule, which was set to take effect this month.

Judge Pittman’ decision follows a lawsuit filed by several banking industry groups challenging the legality of the rule. These groups argued that the Biden administration had overstepped its authority by imposing restrictions on the fees that financial institutions could levy on their customers. Judge Pittman sided with the plaintiffs, granting their request for a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of the rule.

“The credit card lobby’s lawsuit is an attempt to derail a rule that will save families $10 billion each year in order to continue making tens of billions of dollars in profits by charging borrowers late fees that far exceed their actual costs,” a CFPB spokesperson told CNN after the ruling. “We will continue to defend this rule so that working families can stop paying excessive late fees that Congress banned more than a decade ago.”

The Biden administration had justified the rule as a necessary measure to protect consumers from unfair and excessive charges, particularly during times of economic hardship. Proponents of the regulation argued that high late fees could disproportionately harm low-income individuals and those facing financial difficulties.

However, opponents, including the banking industry, contended that the rule would have negative consequences for financial institutions and could ultimately restrict access to credit for consumers. They maintained that credit card companies needed flexibility in setting fees to account for the risks associated with lending and to cover administrative costs.

The ruling by Judge Pittman represents a temporary victory for opponents of the fee cap, but the legal battle is likely far from over. The Biden administration may appeal the decision, seeking to overturn the injunction and proceed with the implementation of the rule. In the meantime, the outcome of this case underscores the ongoing debate surrounding consumer protection measures and the balance between regulating financial practices and maintaining a competitive marketplace.

share this story

© crednews a division of cred.ai

cred.ai originals

latest posts

Spotify just took its streaming game sky-high. Starting this week, United Airlines passengers will have access to over 450 hours of curated Spotify content—including playlists, audiobooks, and for the…
The French Open wrapped this past weekend with rising stars Coco Gauff and Carlos Alcaraz cementing their places in tennis history. Both athletes pulled off major wins in record-setting…
In an unassuming corner of South Carolina, a team of engineers is conjuring hurricanes, hurling fire, and pelting buildings with high-speed hail—on purpose. At the Insurance Institute for Business…
Mushrooms might shape the future of sustainable materials. Scientists at the Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa) have developed a biodegradable, plastic-like substance made from mushroom…

view the code through your phone’s camera
app and click the link that appears.
click the  X  or “esc” to close.